This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] Implementation of n3793 <experimental/optional>

From: Luc Danton <lucdanton at free dot fr>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 18:54:48 +0100
Subject: Re: [Patch] Implementation of n3793 <experimental/optional>
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <5260CFE7 dot 7000808 at free dot fr> <CAH6eHdTs43dT6yY=tfL9mfWHKAR3yZ-2j02Scs8FW4zUE=L6=w at mail dot gmail dot com> <52729DF5 dot 6020806 at free dot fr> <CAH6eHdQ9bwMD0Awh9bivCTb83na8i1od6pyqRMULmY48a2-x-A at mail dot gmail dot com> <4589CEDD-15F5-4E9F-9975-196EF10EEA20 at oracle dot com>

On 2013-11-01 21:46, Paolo Carlini wrote:

Hi,

Il giorno 01/nov/2013, alle ore 21:09, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> ha scritto:

Here's the final version of Luc's optional implementation that I'm
committing, tested on x86_64-linux.

Great. Just noticed a minor nit: the fallback __constexpr_addressof appears not to be inline.

Paolo

Can you expand? I think it's just as much inline as the other overload-- does it need to be different?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch] Implementation of n3793 <experimental/optional>
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- Re: [Patch] Implementation of n3793 <experimental/optional>
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [Patch] Implementation of n3793 <experimental/optional>
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]