This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: unordered containers doc

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: François Dumont <frs dot dumont at gmail dot com>
Cc: "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 22:23:04 +0000
Subject: Re: unordered containers doc
References: <5112C7A4.2060403@gmail.com> <CAH6eHdR8BZsx1_jMyxLgWVN5CPZCQGL0J=WQuE3yH5My40QxOw@mail.gmail.com> <51141638.5080804@gmail.com>

On 7 February 2013 21:01, François Dumont wrote:
> Thanks for taking care of it. Here is another version, I think clearer.
> Reading the doc I also found an unfinished sentence in an other chapter, it
> is in the patch.
>
> Just a remark too, if you have some time. I don't understand what bitset doc
> does in 9.Containers/Associative, wouldn't it be better in
> 6.Utilities/Bitset ?

In C++03 <bitset> was in Clause 23 with the associate containers, it
moved for C++11.

References:
- unordered containers doc
  - From: François Dumont
- Re: unordered containers doc
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: unordered containers doc
  - From: François Dumont

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]