This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: templace abuses

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: François Dumont <francois dot cppdevs at free dot fr>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 02:28:26 +0100
Subject: Re: templace abuses
References: <4CF80ABD.8010907@free.fr> <4CF8CDC3.5030800@oracle.com> <AANLkTimyLJbLqfkUwd24cD-SJoYFHR4wXwrefcmBAtke@mail.gmail.com> <4CF95F1D.2010009@free.fr> <4CF96044.7010105@oracle.com>

On 12/03/2010 10:25 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 12/03/2010 10:20 PM, François Dumont wrote:
>   
>> Yes, I like greedy ops. Here is the new proposition.
>>
>> If so I will apply it as soon as I have been able to test it. I am
>> working on an other issue and can't build anymore for the moment.
>>     
> Patch is Ok.
>   
Actually, the patch needed a few tweaks. In particular I had to comment
out the operator+(std::size_t, T): I don't think we can do much at the
level of the various iterator types to avoid this kind of ambiguity...

Tested x86_64-linux, committed.

Paolo.

////////////////////

Attachment: CL
Description: Text document

Attachment: patch
Description: Text document

References:
- templace abuses
  - From: François Dumont
- Re: templace abuses
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: templace abuses
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: templace abuses
  - From: François Dumont
- Re: templace abuses
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]