This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: throw(), pure and const flags on functions

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:17:06 +0200
Subject: Re: throw(), pure and const flags on functions
References: <20090413181630.GF23648@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <49E4534F.9040406@oracle.com> <20090414135449.GH23648@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <49E49D3A.80208@oracle.com> <20090414144657.GI23648@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <49E4A344.3070804@oracle.com> <20090414151108.GB11471@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

Jan Hubicka wrote:
> I will re-implement the warning and see if I can collect some useful
> data.  It however require someone with knowledge of the library to
> decide what really is nothrow/const/pure and what is useful to decorate.
>   
Sounds like an excellent plan. Thanks a lot.
> My knowledge of STL is very limited.
>   
It shows: STL is a pre-standard acronym, obsolete since 1997 ;) ;)

Thanks,
Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: throw(), pure and const flags on functions
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- throw(), pure and const flags on functions
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: throw(), pure and const flags on functions
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: throw(), pure and const flags on functions
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: throw(), pure and const flags on functions
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: throw(), pure and const flags on functions
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: throw(), pure and const flags on functions
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: throw(), pure and const flags on functions
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]