This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: functional, split tr1 and c++0x impl's ?

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: Chris Fairles <chris dot fairles at gmail dot com>, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:04:28 -0700
Subject: Re: functional, split tr1 and c++0x impl's ?
References: <fac6bb500808051500v6cb54732tf7d66a18e5d2fbfe@mail.gmail.com> <22851870.1217974311761.JavaMail.oracle@acsmt301.oracle.com>

> As soon as you have evidence than ~10 ifdefs are required just split,
> split, split. This tr1_impl idea, suggested by Doug, is very nice,
> IMO, because it allows for a smooth transition to the C++0x
> specifications, but as soon as we have evidence that C++0x is
> appreciably different, let's just split and obtain something much
> more clean even if a little redundant.

Agreed. 

-benjamin

References:
- functional, split tr1 and c++0x impl's ?
  - From: Chris Fairles
- Re: functional, split tr1 and c++0x impl's ?
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]