This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: functional, split tr1 and c++0x impl's ?
- From: Douglas Gregor <dgregor at osl dot iu dot edu>
- To: Chris Fairles <chris dot fairles at gmail dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:07:44 -0400
- Subject: Re: functional, split tr1 and c++0x impl's ?
- References: <fac6bb500808051500v6cb54732tf7d66a18e5d2fbfe@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: dgregor at osl dot iu dot edu
On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 18:00 -0400, Chris Fairles wrote:
> Or we
> could just bite the bullet now and split everything because when
> Lambda's are finished, I'm pretty sure the c++0x impl will change
> significantly (correct me if I'm wrong).
Lambdas probably won't change the way we implement <functional>. When we
get the name-mangling issues with decltype settled, *that* will
definitely change <functional>, because all of the return-type-deduction
logic will just disappear.
- Doug