This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] c++0x common_type, <ratio> and <chrono>

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: "Paolo Carlini" <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: "Chris Fairles" <chris dot fairles at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 16:00:21 -0700
Subject: Re: [v3] c++0x common_type, <ratio> and <chrono>
References: <fac6bb500807010546u641d3c27g35d7fb8e68fa9a3f@mail.gmail.com> <de8d50360807071540s3de15754u9b48c930403dbfe4@mail.gmail.com> <31834828.1215471419489.JavaMail.oracle@acsmt301.oracle.com>

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:
>> The cons_overflow.cc and ops_overflow.cc testcase fails on
>> spu-elf as that target does not have denorms for float (it does for double
>> though).
>
> float, double?!? The code actually in only implements <ratio>, which is only about *integer* types (actually only intmax_t + uintmax_t as an implementation detail). Please explain in better detail.

Hmm, then I have no idea why they fail on spu :).  Oh it might be the
case that _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDINT_TR1 is not defined which means it is
not being tested at all :).  I guess the testcase needs to take that
into account when it does dg-error .

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3] c++0x common_type, <ratio> and <chrono>
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- [v3] c++0x common_type, <ratio> and <chrono>
  - From: Chris Fairles
- Re: [v3] c++0x common_type, <ratio> and <chrono>
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [v3] c++0x common_type, <ratio> and <chrono>
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]