This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [v3] c++0x common_type, <ratio> and <chrono>

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>, Chris Fairles <chris dot fairles at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 17:56:59 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: [v3] c++0x common_type, <ratio> and <chrono>
Accept-language: en-US
References: <fac6bb500807010546u641d3c27g35d7fb8e68fa9a3f@mail.gmail.com> <de8d50360807071540s3de15754u9b48c930403dbfe4@mail.gmail.com>

> The cons_overflow.cc and ops_overflow.cc testcase fails on
> spu-elf as that target does not have denorms for float (it does for double
> though).

float, double?!? The code actually in only implements <ratio>, which is only about *integer* types (actually only intmax_t + uintmax_t as an implementation detail). Please explain in better detail.

Thanks,
Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [v3] c++0x common_type, <ratio> and <chrono>
  - From: Andrew Pinski

References:
- [v3] c++0x common_type, <ratio> and <chrono>
  - From: Chris Fairles
- Re: [v3] c++0x common_type, <ratio> and <chrono>
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]