This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] Fix ac_c99_complex configury

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 07 Jun 2005 03:10:19 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch] Fix ac_c99_complex configury
References: <42A46DB2.8040601@suse.de><20050606114331.7e11d734.bkoz@redhat.com><42A4AAEF.90506@codesourcery.com> <42A4C4C4.7090807@suse.de><42A4D26F.8000409@codesourcery.com> <42A4D3EA.9050402@suse.de>

Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> writes:

| Speaking of questions: what about my question regarding
| include/backward? Are your customers still including <iostream.h>? Tell
| me not ;)

well, I can tell you I continue to see people #include <iostream.h> no
matter what we say here.  I don't think it would be a wise move to
remove it. 

-- Gaby

References:
- [Patch] Fix ac_c99_complex configury
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] Fix ac_c99_complex configury
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: [Patch] Fix ac_c99_complex configury
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [Patch] Fix ac_c99_complex configury
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [Patch] Fix ac_c99_complex configury
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [Patch] Fix ac_c99_complex configury
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]