This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch] Fix ac_c99_complex configury


> the use of the new __builtin_clog exposed a serious weakness in our
> configury: the check for ac_c99_complex (and then for
> _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_COMPLEX), uses the C compiler together with
> AC_TRY_COMPILE: we are basically checking for prototypes but C (vs C++)
> doesn't care and this means that the test basically *always* passes. I
> propose to simply use AC_TRY_LINK, here and I'm finishing regtesting the
> below.

You can't use any link tests in this macro, it's used by crosses and native toolchains.

Instead I propose that you just use the C++ compiler here, and fixup
the issue with backwards/complex.h.

Thoughts?

-benjamin


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]