This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Unuglified name in __normal_iterator
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>Bah, I'm not particularly worried by this, by itself, maybe a disclaimer
>>in a code comment (this is our general policy, in such cases, I think).
>>
>>
>I didn't think we had such cases, in general. All non-standard names are
>uglified or in <ext/foobar>, aren't they?
>
>
For sure we have non-standard additional constructors in the locale facets.
But, really, I don't have a strong opinion but this specific case of
base(), want only to make sure we agree *which* is the real issue.
Paolo.