This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Unuglified name in __normal_iterator
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 08:55:56PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> caj@cs.york.ac.uk wrote:
>
> >More personal worry was more that someone might use this function without
> >realising its non-standard (as reverse_iterator does provide a base
> >method)...
> >
> >
> Bah, I'm not particularly worried by this, by itself, maybe a disclaimer
> in a code comment (this is our general policy, in such cases, I think).
I didn't think we had such cases, in general. All non-standard names are
uglified or in <ext/foobar>, aren't they?
jon