This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Idea for more delegations in <algorithm>

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Chris Jefferson <caj at cs dot york dot ac dot uk>
Cc: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:54:39 +0100
Subject: Re: Idea for more delegations in <algorithm>
References: <4241980D.7010908@suse.de> <4241A3CC.8040208@cs.york.ac.uk> <4241A625.3060907@suse.de> <4241AB28.4070808@cs.york.ac.uk>

Chris Jefferson wrote:

I've had a look at enable_if, and I think we can make use of it still. Unless someone says what is below is pointless / broken, I'll make a clean demo patch sometime tonight / tomorrow.

Cool! As per my previous message... Just stay away from defaults... By the way, if I understand correctly your idea (I have to run now, sorry) we have already quite a few "good" usages of enable_if, as return type, no defaults, in the library (and only 1 of the "bad" type ;)

Paolo.

References:
- Idea for more delegations in <algorithm>
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Idea for more delegations in <algorithm>
  - From: Chris Jefferson
- Re: Idea for more delegations in <algorithm>
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: Idea for more delegations in <algorithm>
  - From: Chris Jefferson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]