This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

PATCH: testsuite/26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc


This test has been xfailed for all Linux systems, but I can't see how the test is
failing these days.  Okay to commit the following patch to mainline (with suitably
obvious ChangeLog entry)?

If this is not the correct patch, can anyone explain the rationale?

Cheers, Ben

Index: testsuite/26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc
===================================================================
RCS file:
/home/bje/gcc-cvs/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 c99_classification_macros_c.cc
--- testsuite/26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc  2 Mar 2005 03:02:45
-0000       1.2
+++ testsuite/26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc  9 Mar 2005 02:47:46 -0000
@@ -27,8 +27,7 @@
 // invalidate any other reasons why the executable file might be covered by
 // the GNU General Public License.

-// { dg-do compile { xfail *-*-linux-gnu } }
-// { dg-excess-errors "" { target *-*-linux-gnu } }
+// { dg-do compile }

#include <math.h>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]