This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch: stl_vector.h and vector.tcc

From: Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: nathan at codesourcery dot com, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:54:51 -0700
Subject: Re: Patch: stl_vector.h and vector.tcc
References: <1089638663.3669.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20040730164534.6c124dfe.bkoz@redhat.com> <410B628B.2050001@suse.de> <m3acxgdset.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <BFB583D6-E321-11D8-8DFE-000393B2ABA2@apple.com> <410D7FC9.8040807@codesourcery.com>

On Aug 1, 2004, at 4:42 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:

Matt Austern wrote:


I believe Matt's suggestion is the right long term approach, assuming
we have an implementation of #nospam.  For the mid-term, I think that
using bits/cpp_type_traits.h is the most viable option -- with proper
uglification.

I wonder if this does have to be "long term"?  If we think that we
have a good specification of preprocessor scoping, I bet it won't
be that hard to implement.

I don't attend EWG sessions, so I don't have a good sense of how it
was received.  Did it look to you as if the feature is ready to
implement as Bjarne proposed it?

I know that Nathan Sidwell had some pretty serious objections to Bjarne's proposal, but I'm not sure whether they've gotten through the UK committee yet, or not.

OK, I think that's a good reason not to go ahead implementing things yet.

--Matt

References:
- Re: Patch: stl_vector.h and vector.tcc
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]