This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch: stl_vector.h and vector.tcc

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>, nathan at codesourcery dot com
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 16:42:01 -0700
Subject: Re: Patch: stl_vector.h and vector.tcc
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <1089638663.3669.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20040730164534.6c124dfe.bkoz@redhat.com> <410B628B.2050001@suse.de> <m3acxgdset.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <BFB583D6-E321-11D8-8DFE-000393B2ABA2@apple.com>

Matt Austern wrote:


I believe Matt's suggestion is the right long term approach, assuming
we have an implementation of #nospam.  For the mid-term, I think that
using bits/cpp_type_traits.h is the most viable option -- with proper
uglification.

I wonder if this does have to be "long term"?  If we think that we
have a good specification of preprocessor scoping, I bet it won't
be that hard to implement.

I don't attend EWG sessions, so I don't have a good sense of how it
was received.  Did it look to you as if the feature is ready to
implement as Bjarne proposed it?

I know that Nathan Sidwell had some pretty serious objections to Bjarne's proposal, but I'm not sure whether they've gotten through the UK committee yet, or not.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Patch: stl_vector.h and vector.tcc
  - From: Matt Austern
- Re: Patch: stl_vector.h and vector.tcc
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]