This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Missing inlines?
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: Joerg dot Richter at pdv-FS dot de
- Cc: bop at gmb dot dk, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 11 Dec 2003 10:59:20 +0100
- Subject: Re: Missing inlines?
- Organization: Integrable Solutions
- References: <E8CDBCCCB3158347AC15ADEBFB24A84F482DD0@fsexchng.pdv-fs.de>
Joerg.Richter@pdv-FS.de writes:
| >> Has no inline.
| >> I wonder if this is wanted?
|
| > Perhaps, but it isn't required for templates.
|
| Is my memory wrong? I can remember compilers warning about multiple
| definitions of the same template instantiation when you missed the inline.
I've heard that for some broken proprietary compilers that have
managed to pervert the meaning of "inline".
| Is this behavior standard? Or is this GCC specific?
GCC behaviour is standard-required behaviour.
-- Gaby