This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Missing inlines?
- From: Joerg dot Richter at pdv-FS dot de
- To: bop at gmb dot dk, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:42:49 +0100
- Subject: Re: Missing inlines?
>> Has no inline.
>> I wonder if this is wanted?
> Perhaps, but it isn't required for templates.
Is my memory wrong? I can remember compilers warning about multiple
definitions of the same template instantiation when you missed the inline.
Is this behavior standard? Or is this GCC specific?
>> I think it should be ok to add this missing inlines.
> It is ok, but perhaps not required.
I added them all, I hope. Rebuilt compiler. And now the relevant exception
in a relativ big program gets caught.
But this is no proof that this was the failure. But I hope for the best.
Joerg