This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Something about std::list<> member functions.

From: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, gp dot bolton at computer dot org, dhruvbird at gmx dot net, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:48:22 -0700
Subject: Re: Something about std::list<> member functions.
References: <1060419109.2485.3.camel@home.free> <3F351D1F.4080205@free.fr> <m3vft6228y.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <20030811092807.0bda6cf2.bkoz@redhat.com>

On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:28:07AM -0500, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> 
> >Then, I discovered that our lovely compiler is not always inlining
> >those pretty trivial function objects.  Then I didn't apply the
> >patches. 
> 
> Gaby, you might want to see if -funit-at-a-time helps with the inlining
> issues.

So it's back to Gaby's earlier controversial thread on the gcc list: it
should be possible to get g++ to do proper inlining without having to
resort to a method that has to consume more memory.

References:
- Something about std::list<> member functions.
  - From: Dhruv Matani
- Re: Something about std::list<> member functions.
  - From: Gawain Bolton
- Re: Something about std::list<> member functions.
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Something about std::list<> member functions.
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]