Re: Something about std::list<> member functions.

[Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>]

>Then, I discovered that our lovely compiler is not always inlining
>those pretty trivial function objects.  Then I didn't apply the
>patches. 

Gaby, you might want to see if -funit-at-a-time helps with the inlining
issues. Supposedly this fixes optimization/9767, which is a good sign.
The performance testsuite shows very little improvement, which is
suspicious. (As of this date, I'm still having difficulties with using
this flag and unresolved symbols. Apparently it's optimizing away
statics, and I cannot get a clean testrun with it enabled.)

Regardless of the compiler issues, you might want to post that patch if
you can find it. It would probably be useful for other people to see
what you did.

-benjamin