This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: What's the name of this library? (was: Re: autotools transition report: v 28.07)

On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:32:14AM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> writes:
> 
> | So, you're voting for (3) or (4)?
> 
> I would vote for 4.1 if it can be made to work, and keep 4 as joker.

4.1 cannot be made to work, at least, not right now.  The -- switches in
question are controlled by a libtool macro.  I have an idea how we might
do it, but not soon.

I'm going for (4).

-- 
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
    - Brian W. Kernighan
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]