This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Hello people. There's long been talk of storing performance-related tests in the testsuite itself. Here's a first crack at actually doing this. In preparing this patch, I did a lot of CVS/web/mailing list excavation (including the finding of Loren's post to switch back to the pool allocator on 2001-05-03, which it seems is the basis for the subsequent allocator tests). It was pretty interesting, but perhaps I forgot somethings. If so, let me know. I thought it was a good idea to put these sources in the testsuite, even if they are not run by default, so that the maintainers are not all carting around little test programs in a separate directory. (As I've been doing for much too long now.) Thoughts? Suggestions and improvements? Issues/Notes. 1) Many of these tests are similar, large loops doing one thing. 2) Some of these tests produce large output files (75MB) (which are removed with make clean, of course.) Some require large input files. Should they be run by default? 3) There are no hooks to run these. Instead, they are just run and the results thrown away. It's assumed that people will run these by hand as part of the release process. (This is a similar situation as the interactive tests.) Perhaps something like the bench++ timers can be added later to testsuite_hooks.cc. 4) There is no extension or naming practice designating the performance tests. Should there be? If so, then they could be mixed into the usual organization like the _neg tests and the _xin tests, and perhaps ignored by default. This is probably a better solution than what I've got here. 5) Some of these tests represent problems that have not been fully addressed. Putting them in the testsuite just means that it's easier for maintainers to track these issues. 6) Some, like 4150 are not suitable for admission. I'm in the middle of revamping the testsuite documentation, but thought I'd post this to see what people have to say. -benjamin
Attachment:
p.20030516-1
Description: Binary data
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |