This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: -fpic/-fPIC testresults under sol2.9 & ppclinux trunk
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- Cc: rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com, geoffk at apple dot com, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 21:11:07 -0500
- Subject: Re: -fpic/-fPIC testresults under sol2.9 & ppclinux trunk
- References: <3EB6A4CB.5020300@pop.agri.ch><200305150244.h4F2ioDf068496@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com><200305160114.VAA17192@caip.rutgers.edu>
>It's not my intention to paper over any bug by disabling PCH. But
>running with every test failing because of this problem will mask real
>libstdc++ regressions should an unrelated regression occur. Testing
>the library isn't very useful in my current situation...
You're not the only one but I don't have time to deal with this at the moment.
>I'm going to run my personal tests with PCH disabled because of this
>until the PR is fixed. I would suggest we do that globally in the
>repo for the same reasons but I won't insist since not everyone runs
>multi-passes.
It's a valid option. If enough people insist on this I think it's reasonable.
>I've added myself to the CC list of the PR. BTW I didn't see Geoff
>CC'ed in the PR, does he know about it?
Dunno. Geoff, can you take a look at this? If not, can you give us a
time estimate so we can figure out what to do with disabling PCH on
mainline so that people can get valid test results?
thanks,
benjamin