This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] Two other thingies

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 09:45:20 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch] Two other thingies
References: <07D05A69A3D0C14FAEA60C3ACE8E5564028F5573@nike.hir.is> <20030506212402.04861de9.bkoz@redhat.com>

Benjamin Kosnik wrote:

As you imply, there should be tests of sgetn on an ostream, sputn on an
istream, etc. before you attempt simplification. There might be some
tests like this existent in the testsuite, but probably nothing
consistent? Testing this should be possible if you test with a derived
class of filebuf, but you might as well do the whole enchilada and do
all the streambufs, with all the members.

Ok, thanks. Will work on that.

Paolo.

References:
- RE: [Patch] Two other thingies
  - From: Pétur Runólfsson
- Re: [Patch] Two other thingies
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]