This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: RFC: new __cxa_demangle
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:38:57 -0500
- Subject: Re: RFC: new __cxa_demangle
- References: <20030219173101.0196e30a.bkoz@redhat.com>
> Instead, I propose to move the
> __cxa_demangle sources into src, and remove the current bits in
> libsupc++. This will result in __cxa_demangle being undefined in
> libsupc++.a, and defined only in libstdc++.[a, so] (but versioned with
> the runtime CXXABI name.)
Works for me. It's arguable that demangling falls under "language support,"
but really, if your project is "big" enough that it needs to do demangling,
needing stdc++ instead of supc++ shouldn't be a problem.
Phil
--
I would therefore like to posit that computing's central challenge, viz. "How
not to make a mess of it," has /not/ been met.
- Edsger Dijkstra, 1930-2002