This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: [v3] More libstdc++/8761 and 7076
- From: jlquinn at optonline dot net
- To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "B. Kosnik" <bkoz at nabi dot net>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 14:31:45 -0500
- Subject: Re: [v3] More libstdc++/8761 and 7076
----- Original Message -----
From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
Date: Monday, February 3, 2003 12:55 pm
Subject: Re: [v3] More libstdc++/8761 and 7076
>
> >_M_write doesn't have to be at global scope, it
can be a member
> >function. See below. Ok with these mods. Thoughts?
>
> Ouch! It's not inlined as a member function, but
it is at global
> scope.What's up with that?
>
> -benjamin
I originally left it out of the class to avoid
adding yet another thing to the ABI. Although if it
was going to get inline'd I guess it is less
relevant. If it gets inlined, either way is fine by me.
I don't have any clue about why it wouldn't inline
as a member, unfortunately.
You'll have to check it in for me.
Jerry