This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: basic-improvements merge status
- From: Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:47:31 -0800
- Subject: Re: basic-improvements merge status
On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 03:39 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On the other hand, if you don't have a c99-compliant library,
I wonder if you should be using -std=c99 at all.
Should this be something we probe for during the
configure step? Unless you're building a cross
compiler, we can test to see if real C99 compliance
is possible.
(And then the next question: is a hybrid, with the
C99 core language and the C90 library, interesting?
If so, what should we call it?)
--Matt