This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: basic-improvements merge status

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 18 Dec 2002 00:40:19 +0100
Subject: Re: basic-improvements merge status
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <87bs3l3ab5.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><200212162212.RAA27306@makai.watson.ibm.com><20021216221828.GB3138@kam.mff.cuni.cz><20021216222324.GA511@daikokuya.co.uk><20021216230448.GJ3138@kam.mff.cuni.cz><m3adj5hwda.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><20021217233955.GB2188@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

[...]

| > Since it doesn't, because there no library support with
| > it), it is *wrong* to assume it is operating in C99 mode.
| 
| On the other hand, if you don't have a c99-compliant library,
| I wonder if you should be using -std=c99 at all.

No body was using -std=c99 when building libstdc++-v3.

-- Gaby

Follow-Ups:
- Re: basic-improvements merge status
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Re: basic-improvements merge status
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: basic-improvements merge status
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: basic-improvements merge status
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: basic-improvements merge status
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: basic-improvements merge status
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: basic-improvements merge status
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]