This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: More test results...

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 18:12:52 +0000
Subject: Re: More test results...
References: <wvl8z8yt5t5.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com><Pine.SOL.3.91.1020313092607.18227A-100000@taarna.cygnus.com><20020313124253.A28747@disaster.basement.lan>

>>>>> "Phil" == Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> writes:

> I think the std_limits.h file became cleaner to read with that patch.
> Must it be reverted?

I argued against it in an earlier note; I don't like that changing the
value means changing the ABI.  Do you disagree?

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: More test results...
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: More test results...
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- Re: More test results...
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: More test results...
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: More test results...
  - From: Phil Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]