This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: DRs and TCs (was Re: Poor me... (was: Re: [PATCH, RFA] Reworked fix for PR4402))
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 02 Dec 2001 09:21:10 +0100
- Subject: Re: DRs and TCs (was Re: Poor me... (was: Re: [PATCH, RFA] Reworked fix for PR4402))
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <20011201213010.A4028@disaster.jaj.com>
Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com> writes:
| Once we have something offical we can point to and say, "there, that's
| the TC," then yeah, the appropriate guards should go.
Issues with status DRs are definitely now part of the language. We should
not wait 2050 before putting them in the library. Please, notice that
the front-end already incorporates many of the issues with DRs status.
The current position is inconsistent.
-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com