This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: V3 static data in classes vs AIX

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: V3 static data in classes vs AIX
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
Date: 04 Jun 2001 22:07:45 +0200
Cc: gdr at codesourcery dot com, dje at watson dot ibm dot com, bkoz at redhat dot com, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <200106041756.NAA29764@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20010604111152X.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <fln17o3uox.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <20010604125637C.mitchell@codesourcery.com>

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

| >>>>> "Gabriel" == Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com> writes:
| 
|     Gabriel> | If my hypothesis is correct, and removing the code
|     Gabriel> fixes the problem, | then I would check that in, after
|     Gabriel> the obligatory test-suite run.
| 
|     Gabriel> I would much prefer a compiler fix.
| 
| Isn't that what I was suggesting? 

Yes -- my understanding was that you were proposing a compiler fix vs. a
library fix and asking for a vote; I guess I misundertand you.

|  Removing the code from cp/decl2.c  would be the compiler fix.

Yes, that is what I indended but failed to name it appropriately.

-- Gaby
CodeSourcery, LLC                       http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- Re: V3 static data in classes vs AIX
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: V3 static data in classes vs AIX
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: V3 static data in classes vs AIX
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: V3 static data in classes vs AIX
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]