This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: V3 static data in classes vs AIX

To: gdr at codesourcery dot com
Subject: Re: V3 static data in classes vs AIX
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 12:56:37 -0700
Cc: dje at watson dot ibm dot com, bkoz at redhat dot com, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <200106041756.NAA29764@makai.watson.ibm.com><20010604111152X.mitchell@codesourcery.com><fln17o3uox.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr>

>>>>> "Gabriel" == Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com> writes:

    Gabriel> | If my hypothesis is correct, and removing the code
    Gabriel> fixes the problem, | then I would check that in, after
    Gabriel> the obligatory test-suite run.

    Gabriel> I would much prefer a compiler fix.

Isn't that what I was suggesting?  Removing the code from cp/decl2.c
would be the compiler fix.

The only change to V3 will be (possibly) more explicit instantiations
-- which is really the only way we have of dealing with AIX at this
point.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: V3 static data in classes vs AIX
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- Re: V3 static data in classes vs AIX
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: V3 static data in classes vs AIX
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: V3 static data in classes vs AIX
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]