This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
From: Stephen M. Webb <stephen at bregmasoft dot com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 09:13:28 -0400
Cc: bkoz at redhat dot com,libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CRYPTOCard Corporation
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1010524142821.13838A-100000@taarna.cygnus.com> <01052422213300.01036@umbriel> <20010524194556J.mitchell@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: stephen at bregmasoft dot com

On Thu, 24 May 2001, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> >>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen M Webb <stephen@bregmasoft.com> writes:
> 
>     Stephen> It looks like they, or working shadow headers, might be
>     Stephen> desireable for the 3.0 release if the c_std stuff just
>     Stephen> won't work. 
> 
> It'll work good enough.  I don't think we want a wholesale revision
> right now; I was just tickling around the edges.  (I removed a
> misfeature in the compiler that showed up some problems that had been
> hidden.)

I can't tell you how good that is to hear (read?).

__
Stephen M. Webb

References:
- Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
  - From: Stephen M. Webb
- Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]