This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.

To: stephen at bregmasoft dot com
Subject: Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 19:45:56 -0700
Cc: bkoz at redhat dot com, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1010524142821.13838A-100000@taarna.cygnus.com><01052422213300.01036@umbriel>

>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen M Webb <stephen@bregmasoft.com> writes:

    Stephen> It looks like they, or working shadow headers, might be
    Stephen> desireable for the 3.0 release if the c_std stuff just
    Stephen> won't work. 

It'll work good enough.  I don't think we want a wholesale revision
right now; I was just tickling around the edges.  (I removed a
misfeature in the compiler that showed up some problems that had been
hidden.)

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
  - From: Stephen M. Webb

References:
- Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
  - From: Stephen M. Webb

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]