This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.

To: bkoz at redhat dot com
Subject: Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 01:19:25 -0700
Cc: aj at suse dot de, gdr at codesourcery dot com, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, drepper at cygnus dot com
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <20010525002205K.mitchell@codesourcery.com><Pine.SOL.3.91.1010525010546.21533D-100000@taarna.cygnus.com>

>>>>> "Benjamin" == Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:

    Benjamin> I'm starting to lean towards it as the real solution for
    Benjamin> gnu-linux.

I agree.

Note that, however, that doesn't get V3 off the hook with respect to
all the other important operating systems.  So, we still need to
invest in the c_shadow technology.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

References:
- Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Overloading vs. string functions, etc.
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]