This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: libstdc++-v3 and GCC 2.95.3
- To: Kevin Williams <KWilliams at visionael dot com>
- Subject: Re: libstdc++-v3 and GCC 2.95.3
- From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 12:49:40 -0400
- Cc: "'libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- References: <304D429618A8D41187D50008C7F4307414D3AF@mail.visionael.com>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 10:26:51AM -0500, Kevin Williams wrote:
> Is the current GCC
> release (2.95.3) not supported by libstdc++-v3?
Nope.
> So, I guess I'm asking - is there any way to get libstdc++-2.92 to work
> with GCC 2.95.2 or 2.95.3? If not, are there any known problems with
> getting libstdc++-2.91 to work with GCC 2.95.2 on Solaris (since I can't
> seem to get it to build)?
See http://gcc.gnu.org/libstdc++/status.html, particularly the part reading
The most recent version of this library that will build with GCC 2.95.2
is the ninth snapshot release, libstdc++-2.90.8.tar.gz.
I don't know whether the same holds true of 2.95.3. I've heard that it
does and I've heard that it doesn't, but haven't heard anything from an
authoritative source, and haven't checked myself. So you might be stuck
with 2.95.2 if you need to use libstdc++-v3 2.90.8.
Phil
--
pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com | pme at sources dot redhat dot com
devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
The gods do not protect fools. Fools are protected by more capable fools.