This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: CNI vs JNI in performance?

Hi,

I've browsed the archives, but cannot find the answer:
Which is the better to use: CNI or JNI?
This is regarding rapid invocations from Java (for talking with a
rs485-device) transferring byte-arrays back and forth...
I was wondering which method has the most overhead, etc...
CNI is the one with less overhead, its just not so portable as only gcj/g++ support it yet. "Portability" is the domain of JNI for now.
And this is with respect to both speed and memory?

But I clearly see you point regarding portability - but this is somewhat secondary for my specific target :o)

Thanks,
 Martin

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]