This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

CNI vs JNI in performance?

From: Martin Egholm Nielsen <martin at egholm-nielsen dot dk>
To: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:14:21 +0200
Subject: CNI vs JNI in performance?

Hi there,

I've browsed the archives, but cannot find the answer: Which is the better to use: CNI or JNI? This is regarding rapid invocations from Java (for talking with a rs485-device) transferring byte-arrays back and forth... I was wondering which method has the most overhead, etc...

Best regards,
 Martin Egholm

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CNI vs JNI in performance?
  - From: Michael Koch

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]