This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni


>>>>> "Cedric" == Cedric Berger <cedric@berger.to> writes:

[ followups trimmed ]

>> How about asking Sun to support CNI then ?

Cedric> Bleah
Cedric> They technically cannot support it.
Cedric> CNI doesn't work with precise copying collectors, AFAIK.

CNI requires modifications to your C++ compiler to work.
There's no technical reason that one couldn't modify a C++ compiler
to also work with a precise copying collector while you're at it.

That's not to say it might not be hard.  For GCC it looks basically
unfeasible.  I suspect nobody will ever make the effort.

Perhaps this is a distinction without a difference?  Sometimes I find
it interesting to contemplate CNI's definition as separable from its
current implementation.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]