This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni

From: Cedric Berger <cedric at berger dot to>
To: Momchil Velikov <velco at fadata dot bg>
Cc: java-gnome-developer at lists dot sourceforge dot net, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, debian-java at lists dot debian dot org, kaffe at kaffe dot org, sablevm-developer at lists dot sourceforge dot net
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:42:41 +0100
Subject: Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni
References: <20040311174441.GA26451@pathfinderii.chu.cam.ac.uk> <1079031847.14886.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> <874qsuom1m.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1079083849.17163.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <87r7vytn8m.fsf@freon.briz.fadata.bg>

Momchil Velikov wrote:

How about asking Sun to support CNI then ?

Because it's they who limit your "freedoom of choice", by supporting only one (the technically inferior, AIUI) interface.

Bleah
They technically cannot support it.
CNI doesn't work with precise copying collectors, AFAIK.
Cedric

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- Java-Gnome: jni or cni
  - From: Mark Howard
- Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni
  - From: Elias Martenson
- Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni
  - From: Elias Martenson
- Re: [Java-gnome-developer] Java-Gnome: jni or cni
  - From: Momchil Velikov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]