This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: autotools version possibilities
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: tromey at redhat dot com
- Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, adl at users dot sourceforge dot net
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:39:13 -0600
- Subject: Re: autotools version possibilities
- Organization: Red Hat / Chicago
- References: <20040302103859.73488b4a.bkoz@redhat.com><87ishldb2x.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
>libjava is in a weird situation again. The released versions of
>automake generate a Makefile.in that is much too large to be seriously
>considered. We've got a fix for this, but I think it won't show up
>until 1.9 :-(
Ok, thanks for the current status report.
>Alexandre suggested that we could use an "officially unreleased"
>version, or something like that, but I tend to doubt that this would
>be acceptable for GCC. Part of the point of the upgrade is to get
>the whole tree on a single official release again...
When the libjava bits get sorted out, and there is some non-hacked and
official release that works, can you let the libstdc++ list know?
I guess we'll just continue to track the official versions for the time being.
thanks,
benjamin