This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Reminder: Illegal Package-Private Accesses in libgcj

From: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
To: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at hotmail dot com>
Cc: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at mckinlay dot net dot nz>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, scottg at mantatest dot com
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 20:46:04 -0800
Subject: Re: Reminder: Illegal Package-Private Accesses in libgcj
References: <3FA539CB.3DC9D718@hotmail.com> <BB82E609-0D90-11D8-AFD5-003065F97F7C@mckinlay.net.nz> <3FA5DBE7.4060904@hotmail.com>

Ranjit Mathew wrote:

Cool! Somewhat off-topic for this thread, I'm curious
to know how you will be able to avoid calling backtrace( )
for targets that do not have DWARF-2 EH frame based
unwinding for an exception. For example, Win32 is an
SJLJ-EH target (as of now).

I beleve that on many targets that if you compile with -fno-omit-framepointer it is usually quite easy to generate a stacktrace by walking the stack.

David Daney.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reminder: Illegal Package-Private Accesses in libgcj
  - From: Ranjit Mathew

References:
- Reminder: Illegal Package-Private Accesses in libgcj
  - From: Ranjit Mathew
- Re: Reminder: Illegal Package-Private Accesses in libgcj
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Reminder: Illegal Package-Private Accesses in libgcj
  - From: Ranjit Mathew

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]