This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] libart-config check

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Matthias Klose <doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 04 Aug 2003 12:33:04 -0600
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libart-config check
References: <16169.10197.303681.239607@gargle.gargle.HOWL><87wudxz8et.fsf@fleche.redhat.com><200308011808.06032.konqueror@gmx.de><87k79xz5sb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com><16174.42536.828041.385534@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Matthias" == Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:

Matthias> checked in the attached patch

Hmm, libart.m4 comes from gnome-libs-devel.  Modifying it is probably
not the best idea.  Better would be to get the patch upstream.

Classpath doesn't have libart.m4 checked in, but rather relies on
aclocal finding it.  So modifying it there is not possible.

I don't know what is going on here.  It all looks pretty suspect to
me; multiple versions of libart (apparently with different licenses),
different versions of the config script.  Ugly.

Tom

References:
- Re: [PATCH] libart-config check
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [PATCH] libart-config check
  - From: Michael Koch
- Re: [PATCH] libart-config check
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [PATCH] libart-config check
  - From: Matthias Klose

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]