This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: [PATCH] libart-config check
- From: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>
- To: tromey at redhat dot com, Matthias Klose <doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
- Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 18:08:03 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] libart-config check
- References: <16169.10197.303681.239607@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87wudxz8et.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 1. August 2003 17:47 schrieb Tom Tromey:
> >>>>> "Matthias" == Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
>
> Matthias> At least on Debian systems, a newer version of
> libart-config is Matthias> installed under the name libart2-config.
> the binary libart-config Matthias> belongs to an older version, so
> check for the newer one before.
>
> Hmm, RHL 9 also has libart2-config.
> I don't know anything about this part of the configury, and I'm too
> busy to learn today :-(. Do we ever want to run libart-config?
> I think this patch is fine, but if we don't want libart-config,
> then a patch to just s/libart/libart2/ would also be fine.
>
> I think something like this also has to go in Classpath. I can
> take care of that once you've decided what to do in libgcj.
I just check upstream libart 2.3.3 and it installs libart-config by
default. I think we should support both names.
Michael
- --
Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/KpBlWSOgCCdjSDsRAllpAJ9UKvaPEw0zJZjvxaPhDd1obuzlRwCgm+Av
/FvFbush6GGtPqYB7EeZ1Hg=
=Bd9j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----