This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2

From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 12:49:07 +1200
Subject: Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2
References: <E16sURW-0002vP-00@elsschot> <1017848085.19862.622.camel@elsschot> <3CABC9DD.20804@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <87bsctyl5f.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <1018301270.4079.73.camel@elsschot> <87it70ftgm.fsf@creche.redhat.com>

Tom Tromey wrote:

>Mark> There are also results for powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu, but they don't
>Mark> look that good (110 unexpected failures).
>Mark> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00275.html
>
>Why is this platform so much worse?  I'm surprised by that.
>

Are these compilation-from-bytecode failures by any chance? I've noticed 
problems with doubles and longs on PPC when doing that.

regards

Bryce.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2
  - From: Mark Wielaard

References:
- Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2
  - From: Mark Wielaard
- Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2
  - From: Mark Wielaard
- Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]