This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
- Cc: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 08 Apr 2002 14:45:32 -0600
- Subject: Re: Analysis of Mauve failures - Part 2
- References: <E16sURW-0002vP-00@elsschot> <1017848085.19862.622.camel@elsschot> <3CABC9DD.20804@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:
>> got 'Fri, 18 May 2001 10:18:06 PDT' but expected
>> 'Fri, 18 May 2001 17:18:06 GMT'
>> Are we missing a Calendar.setTimeZone() somewere?
Bryce> TimeZone and Calendar stuff is known to be somewhat buggy in
Bryce> libgcj so it wouldn't surprise me if something really is wrong
Bryce> here.
At one point most of the Mauve tests here worked for us. Some
regressions were introduced at some point, but I never got around to
looking at them. The Classpath calendar/time code is extremely
sensitive to change. In my experience it is hard to fix a bug without
introducing a regression.
Tom