This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: gcc@gnu.org doesn't like me
- From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
- To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
- Cc: Adam Megacz <gcj at lists dot megacz dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 11:30:03 +1300
- Subject: Re: gcc@gnu.org doesn't like me
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10112041550020.31550-100000@mars.deadcafe.org>
Jeff Sturm wrote:
>Also keep in mind Mark's planned timeframe for 3.1:
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-11/msg00761.html
>
>No new features after 12/15. Of course, libgcj should attempt to adhere
>to this schedule. Though it's not clear to me whether a new port is
>really a "feature".
>
Mark has said in the past that the release schedule/rules do not
necessarily apply to gcj/libgcj - its up to us to use our discretion
about what java changes go in during the stabilization period (asssuming
they do not affect other parts of the compiler, of course). My feeling
is that 2 months is longer than we need for stabilization work in gcj,
and my vote is to continue to accept most changes/enhancements/ports
during this period.
regards
Bryce.