This is the mail archive of the
java-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: New C++ ABI: patches.
Mark Mitchell writes:
> First, the ChangeLog is wrong (it's class.c) and second there are
> C++-style comments in the patch. :-)
Hehe, that's funny.
> Constructors always wrote the vtable at the beginning of the
> constructor; that's what they're supposed to do.
This is the first time we use a C++ constructor to initialize a Java
object, I think.
./A
2001-01-12 Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com>
* cp/class.c: (dfs_accumulate_vtbl_inits): No accumulation for
Java type.
Index: class.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/egcs/gcc/cp/class.c,v
retrieving revision 1.355
diff -u -p -r1.355 class.c
--- class.c 2001/01/10 23:06:26 1.355
+++ class.c 2001/01/13 17:33:57
@@ -7156,7 +7156,10 @@ dfs_accumulate_vtbl_inits (binfo, orig_b
{
tree inits = NULL_TREE;
- if (BINFO_NEW_VTABLE_MARKED (orig_binfo, t))
+ if (BINFO_NEW_VTABLE_MARKED (orig_binfo, t)
+ /* Don't accumulate for Java types. Java object ctors written in
+ C++ shouldn't fix the vtbl. */
+ && !TYPE_FOR_JAVA (BINFO_TYPE (binfo)))
{
tree vtbl;
tree index;