This is the mail archive of the java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Current libgcj tree warning

To: apbianco at redhat dot com
Subject: Re: Current libgcj tree warning
From: Tom Tromey <tromey at cygnus dot com>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 15:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at cygnus dot com>, Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>, java-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <3925E841.36C2EBE8@albatross.co.nz><200005200122.SAA26580@ferrule.cygnus.com><3925EB7C.C51193C@albatross.co.nz><200005200135.SAA26583@ferrule.cygnus.com><14630.50767.723718.952074@deliverance.cygnus.com>

Alex> The `fold_constant_for_init' patch is a good one. But for final
Alex> constant in qualified expression, the patch for #209 should also
Alex> be used. Tom, rebuilding the entire tree would take too much
Alex> time on my old laptop (though I'm starting a build now.) As a
Alex> result I wouldn't be able to check in a rebuilt version of
Alex> parse.c before hours. Can you please check the following patch
Alex> in?

No problem.  I just checked it in.  Thanks.

Tom

References:
- Current libgcj tree warning
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Current libgcj tree warning
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Current libgcj tree warning
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Current libgcj tree warning
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Current libgcj tree warning
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]