This is the mail archive of the java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Current libgcj tree warning

To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at albatross dot co dot nz>
Subject: Re: Current libgcj tree warning
From: Tom Tromey <tromey at cygnus dot com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 18:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at cygnus dot com>, java-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco at cygnus dot com>
References: <3925E841.36C2EBE8@albatross.co.nz><200005200122.SAA26580@ferrule.cygnus.com><3925EB7C.C51193C@albatross.co.nz>

Bryce> I dont have the text of the error anymore, but in
Bryce> java/io/ObjectInputStream, there are a bunch of constants
Bryce> TC_STRING etc, declared in ObjectStreamConstants. The compiler
Bryce> was complaining that they wern't a valid type for a switch, or
Bryce> something like that. After applying the PR209 patch (to the
Bryce> latest compiler), everything builds fine.

Ok, I did commit a compiler patch (actually two) which fix this
problem.  Alex, are there two different fixes for this floating
around?  Feel free to revert the one I checked in if the PR209 patch
is the one you prefer now.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Current libgcj tree warning
  - From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco

References:
- Current libgcj tree warning
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Current libgcj tree warning
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Current libgcj tree warning
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]